Everyone captures the bug.
We replay it.
Bug capture tools give developers a screenshot, a video and logs. Test reports give them a failed test. Bug Report gives them both, and a Replay button that runs the steps again in their own browser. Here's how it lines up, row by row.
Live replay, not another video
Every recorded step runs again on the real site in the developer's Chrome, with Pause, Back and Forward, and ends with Reproduced or Not reproduced.
Automation that files its own bugs
Our Playwright reporter turns each failed test into a bug report with steps, checks, console, network and video, ready for the developer to replay.
Manual testing: bug capture tools
Tools QA and product teams use to report a bug from the browser.
| Feature | Bug Report | Jam | Marker.io | BugHerd | Loom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screenshot with markup | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Video of the bug | Voice + tab sound (Pro) | Yes | Session replay | Video feedback | Yes |
| Steps to reproduce written for you | Yes | AI-suggested | No | No | No |
| Console logs and network requests | With request / response bodies | Yes | Opt-in | No | No |
| Checks on the page while recording | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Replay the steps live in the developer's own browserSession replay and video show what happened; a live replay performs the steps again on the real site. | Pause, Back, Forward, 0.5x–2x | No | No | No | No |
| Answer after a replay: Reproduced / Not reproduced | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Failed automated tests become bug reports | Playwright | No | No | No | No |
| AI coding assistants (Copy for AI, MCP) | Yes | AI tooling | No | MCP | No |
| Jira, Linear, GitHub | Coming soon | Jira, Linear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Trial, from $39 / month | Trial, from $42 / month | Yes |
Automation testing: Playwright reports
What a team sees after a Playwright run, and what happens to a failure next.
| Feature | Bug Report reporter | Playwright HTML report | Allure Report | ReportPortal | Currents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steps, errors, screenshots and video per test | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playwright trace viewer in the report | Yes | Yes | Attachment | Download | Yes |
| History, trends and flaky tests | Folder kept between runs | No | Needs history folder | Yes | Yes |
| Failures grouped by cause | Yes | No | Categories | ML auto-analysis | No |
| Needs a server or account | No (dashboard optional) | No | No | Self-host or SaaS | Cloud service |
| Price | Free, MIT | Free | Free, open source | Free self-hosted | Paid |
| A failure turned into a filled-in bug report (steps, checks, console, network, video) | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| The developer replays the failure live in their own browserPlaywright's trace viewer (which our report includes) replays a recording of the test; Bug Report also runs the steps again on the live site. | Yes | No | No | No | No |
How we compared
Checked on 17 October 2026 from each product's own public website and documentation. — means the feature isn't offered or isn't mentioned there; products change, and some features may sit behind plans or settings we couldn't see. Every tool here is good at what it does, and many teams use them together. If a row is wrong, tell us at [email protected] and we'll fix it.
Stop watching bugs.
Start replaying them.
We're onboarding QA teams for the beta now. Tell us about yours and we'll get you set up.